Columns
Residents' Association Image

Residents' Association

Southbank sold out by Planning Minister
Read more >>

Business in Southbank Image

Business in Southbank

Market flexes its mussels!
Read more >>

St Johns Southgate Image

St Johns Southgate

Giving without thought of reward
Read more >>

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

Communicating in vertical villages
Read more >>

Montague Community Alliance

Talking about a NEW generation
Read more >>

Housing

We are losing our social licence to operate
Read more >>

Federal Politics Image

Federal Politics

Embracing our past
Read more >>

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Privy Council gets it, Andrews doesn’t
Read more >>

Southbanker Image

Southbanker

Community comes naturally
Read more >>

History Image

History

Planes crash over Southbank
Read more >>

Skypad Living Image

Skypad Living

Vertical Smarts
Read more >>

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

Understanding and managing anxiety
Read more >>

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Fiona and Daisy at the park
Read more >>

Southbank Fashion Image

Southbank Fashion

Spring racing in Southbank
Read more >>

Street Smarts Image

Street Smarts

Power Street – Southbank
Read more >>

Letters Image

Letters

A sincere thank you
Read more >>

Amendment is unacceptable

17 Oct 2011

Can you envisage Southbank with a residential population of 74,000 and a worker population of 54,000?  

The mind boggles at this level of density and the expectations of our planning authorities to accomplish this in, and I quote, “a friendly, pleasant and welcoming neighbourhood where all public spaces are comfortable, bright and safe and local services and facilities are readily available”.

They must be being fed a diet of magic mushrooms if they think this is a possibility. Where will they find the public space?  Where are the local services? Even now with a residential population of 11,500 we do not have even a post office or bank.

With this density of apartment housing, the only way to expand is up. It is doubtful if any sunlight will ever penetrate to ground level, not withstanding the meteorological effects of high-rise buildings causing unpleasant wind tunnels.

This modern philosophy that bigger must be better is not supported by classical examples and to unleash a piranha-like attack by hungry developers keen to make their millions at the expense of our environment is unacceptable.

Our elected representatives and the bureaucrats they employ are commissioned to carry out the wishes of the electors, those that voted them into power, not the groups lobbying on behalf of developers who seem to have infiltrated decision-making at all levels of government.

How does the presently less than 0.11 hectare of public open space for every 1000 people (when a minimum of 0.22 is recommended by the planning authorities) going to be resolved?

The Planning Scheme Amendment C171 that incorporates these proposed changes has triggered a flood of local submissions complaining about the scheme and it is our experience with so-called public consultations they will be ignored and, in effect, will be only a public relations exercise.

Maybe there will be a change of policy with the Minister for Planning listening to his electors and using some common sense in the future for Southbank.

S.F. (Joe) Bagnara
President
Southbank Residents Group

Stay in touch with Southbank. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

Comments

  • Gareth at 10:48am on 06/12/11

    Hi Joe,

    I don’t think people live in Southbank for the open spaces! If you want open spaces move to suburbs!

    I think noise pollution from City Link and the Burnley Tunnel is a far greater issue for Southbank residents like myself.

Page 1 of 1

You must be registered with Southbank Local News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.