Columns
Residents' Association Image

Residents' Association

The parking dilemma?
Read more >>

Business in Southbank Image

Business in Southbank

Apartment living made easy
Read more >>

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

Not all liability policies are created equal
Read more >>

Federal Politics Image

Federal Politics

Maintaining commercial ties with China
Read more >>

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Short-stays behind property price pain
Read more >>

Southbanker Image

Southbanker

A jack of all arts
Read more >>

History Image

History

ASBESTOS!!
Read more >>

Skypad Living Image

Skypad Living

Activating vertical villages
Read more >>

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

Soups, salads, patience and supplements
Read more >>

Councillor Profile Image

Councillor Profile

The making of a lord mayor
Read more >>

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Rocket to the city
Read more >>

Southbank Fashion Image

Southbank Fashion

Spring racing in Southbank
Read more >>

Street Smarts Image

Street Smarts

Power Street – Southbank
Read more >>

Letters Image

Letters

Biased on school name
Read more >>

Southbank Residents’ Group

15 May 2012

You may have heard of the Southbank Structure Plan 2010 and Amendment C171.

This Planning Scheme Amendment C171 applies to all land in Southbank, including South Wharf and if you remove all the rhetoric it is designed to alter the current building regulations so that the Government can squeeze 74,000 residents into our area by the year 2040. That’s a population density greater than Hong Kong!

As part of the “spin-doctoring” our elected representatives and their minders have set up a panel to receive submissions as part of the so-called community consultation. This panel is due to release its report sometime this month.

Some 224 submissions were presented to this committee objecting, in part, to the plan and included a detailed report from us – the Southbank Residents Group.

Most of the issues were centred on tower and podium heights, building separation and offsets, plot ratios, setback of buildings, interaction between frontages and streets reduction of building separations and allowing huge towers along our main streets.

All very well and democratic but how much influence will the concerns of our residents be in the final decision making? Let me suggest none.

How many government consultations have you attended and actually had a positive input? Again I suggest none.

In most, if not all, cases the bureaucrats have already signed off the project and the so-called community consultation becomes an information session.

Amendment C171 will no doubt be promulgated unchanged regardless of the concerns of 224 residents who have taken the time and effort to present a submission.

We have pleaded for over 15 years to have some structural plan mandated for Southbank but with little success. So we are left with issues such as the approval of the ridiculous Queensbridge Hotel development.

No matter what, our elected representatives will continue to ignore us the electors and kneel to the wishes of the developers. Our only answer is the ballot box and the time has come to replace logic and common sense with political methods which would include supporting candidates at all level of government who are in harmony with the needs of the people and the environment.

Let’s put our politicians on notice we want a say in what happens to our Southbank community and demand a genuine consultation process be it C-171 or any other major project.

Stay in touch with Southbank. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Southbank Local News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.