Columns
Residents' Association Image

Residents' Association

An election is upon us!
Read more >>

Business in Southbank Image

Business in Southbank

Frankie’s Story of ethical fashion
Read more >>

St Johns Southgate Image

St Johns Southgate

Routine observations
Read more >>

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

There is something rotten in the State of Victoria
Read more >>

Montague Community Alliance Image

Montague Community Alliance

Be careful who you vote for…
Read more >>

Metro Tunnel

Supporting local traders
Read more >>

Federal Politics Image

Federal Politics

Liberals and Nationals ship sheep
Read more >>

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Show us the money!
Read more >>

Southbanker Image

Southbanker

Strings of dedication
Read more >>

Housing Image

Housing

We are leaving an intergenerational time bomb for our children
Read more >>

History Image

History

Austral Otis Lifts
Read more >>

Safety and Security

Stifle the opportunity
Read more >>

Yarra River Business Association Image

Yarra River Business Association

Reflecting on the past 20 years
Read more >>

Southbank Sustainability Group Image

Southbank Sustainability Group

Can you grow a sunflower as tall as Eureka Tower?
Read more >>

Skypad Living Image

Skypad Living

Luv thy NABERS (for apartments)
Read more >>

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Softie at heart
Read more >>

Southbank Fashion Image

Southbank Fashion

Spring racing in Southbank
Read more >>

Street Smarts Image

Street Smarts

Power Street – Southbank
Read more >>

Letters Image

Letters

Misleading imagery
Read more >>

Amendment changed and submitted

18 Sep 2012

The City of Melbourne has bowed to public pressure and changed the planning Amendment C171: Southbank, strengthening compulsory high-rise separation and height restrictions.

The latest version of the amendment was adapted on the back of several submissions to the changes already made to the amendment by an expert panel.

It has also added residents’ concerns such as taking into account “The impact on the amenity of any dwelling on adjacent sites,” “Ensure that new buildings respect the future development potential of adjacent sites and allow for an equitable spread of development potential on these sites,” and “To ensure that new buildings respect the potential of

future development on adjacent sites to access privacy, sunlight, daylight and an outlook from habitable interiors”.

An improvement to pedestrian access in Southbank has also been written into the amendment.

A major change the expert council had already made to the amendment was the removal of the projection of 74,000 residents by 2040. It no longer states any population projection.

The amendment will now be submitted to Minister for Planning Matthew Guy, and the council was positive in its reactions to the change.

Lord Mayor Robert Doyle said it had taken over two years to get to this point and the balance was as good as the council could expect.

“At some point, even if everyone doesn’t like it, you have to draw a line. I think we’ve got it right. I think the wording is stronger than when we looked at it last time,” Cr Doyle said.

The Chair of Planning, councillor Ken Ong, said: “This is a major change from where we’ve come from. I believe this is a very good, balanced outcome.”

It wasn’t just the submissions to the expert panel’s analysis that made the council move to enact the changes. The Southbank Residents Group met Lord Mayor Robert Doyle to express its concerns last month and he also received letters on the issue from Freshwater Place owners’ corporation chair Peter Renner and Member for Albert Park Martin Foley.

In his letter to the Lord Mayor, Mr Foley said he had been briefed by residents and backed up their concerns about planning within Southbank.

"Whilst we all support the continued growth and prosperity of the Southbank area,

it is increasingly important to recognise the needs of the residents, businesses, commuters and visitors to this area are accommodated and made central to that growth and future planning,” Mr Foley wrote.

“I share the concerns of the SRG that the achievement of this vision (Southbank Structure Plan) will be lost through mounting congestion and lack of attention to the interaction of the competing demands on the Southbank community,” he added.

The Southbank Residents Group (SRG) representatives were unhappy with the outcome of the meeting, but pleased it had helped the process.

SRG spokesperson Cedric Saldanha said the group, while happy with some of the changes to the amendment, was dissatisfied with the new submission to the Minister.

“What we are looking for is a council standing up for us. We have lost an opportunity to take a stand against this (Planning) Minister,” Mr Saldanha said.

Stay in touch with Southbank. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Southbank Local News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.