Columns
Residents' Association Image

Residents' Association

The parking dilemma?
Read more >>

Business in Southbank Image

Business in Southbank

Apartment living made easy
Read more >>

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

Not all liability policies are created equal
Read more >>

Federal Politics Image

Federal Politics

Maintaining commercial ties with China
Read more >>

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Short-stays behind property price pain
Read more >>

Southbanker Image

Southbanker

A jack of all arts
Read more >>

History Image

History

ASBESTOS!!
Read more >>

Skypad Living Image

Skypad Living

Activating vertical villages
Read more >>

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

Soups, salads, patience and supplements
Read more >>

Councillor Profile Image

Councillor Profile

The making of a lord mayor
Read more >>

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Rocket to the city
Read more >>

Southbank Fashion Image

Southbank Fashion

Spring racing in Southbank
Read more >>

Street Smarts Image

Street Smarts

Power Street – Southbank
Read more >>

Letters Image

Letters

Biased on school name
Read more >>

Council called to answer

26 Oct 2014

Council called to answer Image

The Southbank Residents Group is demanding an answer from the City of Melbourne, regarding submissions it claims were not heard.

The submissions relate to the UpMarket application, which was controversially voted down by council last month.

Councillors voted against the advice of their planning officers to side with residents of the Melburnian and Sovereign apartment complexes.

At the Future Melbourne Committee meeting of October 7, Southbank Residents Group President Tony Penna said he had received a number of complaints from residents in support of the application.

“My question is regarding fairness and transparency in respect to the decision-making process of this council,” he said.

“I’ve received complaints from residents that their submissions were not considered by council despite being lodged in accordance with the rules on the council’s website.”

Had it been approved, the UpMarket would have operated from 9am until 4pm every Saturday at the forecourt of the Australian Centre for Contemporary Arts (ACCA), on Grant St.

Mr Penna said he had also received complaints from a number of organisations including ACCA, Green Car Share, Conscious Governance, Langham Hotel Melbourne and Committee for Melbourne regarding unheard submissions.

“My question is, why were all these submissions not considered in the decision making process?” he asked.

“Community engagement with this council is something this council promotes.”

Mr Penna also drew reference to a particular submission, which he claimed held many answers to some of the questions the council claims were unanswered by the UpMarket applicants.

Lord Mayor Robert Doyle was unable to provide any clear reason as to why the submissions were not considered but said all submissions must be lodged in appropriate time.

“We received the submissions as they were sent to us from management, they are all considered,” he said.

“If you submit them an hour before the meeting the likelihood of them being read is probably lower than if you’d submitted them earlier,” he said.

The Lord Mayor said the matter would be followed up with council management and that a written response would be provided to the Southbank Residents Group after an investigation.

Stay in touch with Southbank. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Southbank Local News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.