Columns
Residents' Association Image

Residents' Association

Giving credit where it is due
Read more >>

Business in Southbank Image

Business in Southbank

A passion for good food
Read more >>

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

Check the balcony and terrace rules first
Read more >>

Montague Community Alliance

Life’s too short to be a sceptic …
Read more >>

Federal Politics Image

Federal Politics

Marriage equality – Let’s get it done
Read more >>

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Media campaign reaches 1 million Victorians
Read more >>

Southbanker Image

Southbanker

A supportive Southbanker
Read more >>

Yarra River Business Association Image

Yarra River Business Association

Looking for the reset button for river businesses
Read more >>

Skypad Living Image

Skypad Living

Urban forests in a concrete jungle
Read more >>

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

More than just a body transformation
Read more >>

Councillor Profile Image

Councillor Profile

The making of a lord mayor
Read more >>

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Southbank’s own Jack Sparrow
Read more >>

Southbank Fashion Image

Southbank Fashion

Spring racing in Southbank
Read more >>

Street Smarts Image

Street Smarts

Power Street – Southbank
Read more >>

Council debates residential rights

15 Apr 2014

Council debates residential rights Image

Residential rights were put back on the City of Melbourne (CoM) agenda in April when Councillor Rohan Leppert moved to have third party appeal rights reintroduced to Southbank.

Cr Leppert’s motion was voted down, but not before a passionate debate on the topic of owner’s rights within capital city zones.

The motion focused on the new capital city zones, such as the one created in Southbank via Amendment C171. He also wanted to ensure any future rezoning would not intrude on third party appeal rights.

Cr Leppert argued that areas such as Southbank and City North, which have recently been upgraded to capital city zones, should get their notice and third party objector rights and appeal provisions back. He also stressed the importance of these rights for any future area that may be amended and become part of the capital city zone.

Cr Leppert pointed out that: “The land that the capital city zone originally applied to continues to exempt development applications from notice and third party objector and appeal provisions.”

“I’m moving this motion to seek to put an end to the ongoing staged removal of property owners' planning rights as the capital city zone continues to expand.”

Councillor Leppert reminded his fellow councillors that they're the ones elected to make decisions and therefore council didn’t always have to take the advice of expert panels, as it had when it decided that new capital city zones would not include third party appeal rights.

“Most of their (expert panels') professional advice is excellent; sometimes they get it wrong. Obviously I’m on the record now of saying this ever-expanding capital city zone removing the rights of property owners is wrong,” Cr Leppert said.

Continued on page 5.

“I agree with the height limit suggested in the structure plan, but I do not agree with this ever expanding removal of residents’ rights and property owners’ rights.”

Speaking against the motion, Councillor Stephen Mayne explained that there is more than enough procedure in place for residents, or anyone else, to raise concerns about new developments.

“We already have made more steps to make more scrutiny in capital city zone applications. Every 25,000 sqm and above application comes here (to council) automatically for a full public debate where people can come in and speak for three minutes each,” Cr Mayne said.

“That is a very strong residential right to have input into planning decisions.”

He also said he had seen instances where the same person can hold up the progression of a growth area by months, going to VCAT, only to continually lose cases.

“You’ve got people who are just opposed to the fact that it is a growth area and

The Hoddle Grid and City North and Southbank are growth areas,” Cr Mayne said.

“There are ample opportunities for everyone to have a say.”

The motion was voted down seven votes to three by the Future Melbourne Committee.

Do you think Southbank should reintroduce third party appeal rights? Let us know via our Facebook page www.facebook.com/southbanklocalnews

Stay in touch with Southbank. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Southbank Local News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.