Columns
Residents' Association Image

Residents' Association

Candidates night success
Read more >>

Business in Southbank Image

Business in Southbank

Gorsia Designs opens in Southbank
Read more >>

St Johns Southgate Image

St Johns Southgate

Heroes and villains
Read more >>

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

Why the delay Minister?
Read more >>

Montague Community Alliance

Can you plan a Montague culture …
Read more >>

Housing

We are losing our social licence to operate
Read more >>

Federal Politics Image

Federal Politics

A personally fulfilling outcome
Read more >>

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Make your vote count
Read more >>

Southbanker Image

Southbanker

Gold “Porsche-un” for Niven
Read more >>

History Image

History

Limbless in Southbank
Read more >>

Yarra River Business Association Image

Yarra River Business Association

There’s so much to love about the Yarra
Read more >>

Skypad Living Image

Skypad Living

Vertical visions of lord mayoral candidates
Read more >>

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

Stress in relationships:the sources and the antidotes
Read more >>

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Not so graceful groodles
Read more >>

Southbank Fashion Image

Southbank Fashion

Spring racing in Southbank
Read more >>

Street Smarts Image

Street Smarts

Power Street – Southbank
Read more >>

Letters Image

Letters

Get off your bike!
Read more >>

Council treads softly on apartment standards

13 Aug 2015

Council treads softly on apartment standards Image

The City of Melbourne has made a high-level response to the State Government’s Better Apartments discussion paper, without making any specific recommendations.

The council’s response, which was endorsed by its Future Melbourne Committee on July 7, outlines a number of principles it considers important but couches its ideas in neutral language.

The strongest recommendation is that the standards which apply in NSW could be “considered” as a starting point for Victoria.

In NSW one-bedroom apartments are mandated to be at least 50sqm but in Melbourne, some 40 per cent of apartments are said to be smaller than this.

“We recommend consideration be given to the performance criteria in the NSW Apartment Design Guide as a starting point to develop relevant performance criteria/objectives for the Melbourne context,” the council’s submission says.

The council’s submission suggests responses “could include” separation distances between buildings, communal space requirements, minimum apartment sizes, maximum building/apartment depths, ceiling heights and required levels of sunlight.

But the submission fails to quantify its claims. Rather, it talks about “appropriate” residential densities, “adequate” separation between buildings, “well designed” common areas, “appropriate” sunlight, “efficient” environmental design and “functional” outdoor space.

The council also calls for flexibility in the application of any apartment standards. It recommends that, in “limited circumstances” the Government could provide “deemed-to-comply standards”.

The council notes that Victoria has no density controls and suggests that each apartment be considered in a wider context.

“In light of the lack of density controls, consideration should be given to provisions which directly relate to the amenity of each apartment and contextual factors which significantly impact the amenity of apartments such as site layout and building orientation, separation and built form,” the submission says.

On the question of affordability, the council argues that bigger does not necessarily mean more costly. And, in any event, it says standards should not be compromised.

“The quality of new residential development, however, should not be reduced to the lowest common denominator in pursuit of affordability,” it says.

It admits some very small apartments are good but are rare in the current market.

“Very small apartments which offer good levels of amenity can and do exist, but they rely on clever, integrated and often bespoke design and tend to be the exception in the current market,” the submission says.

“Affordability is not necessarily improved by building smaller homes. The conjunction of increasing sale prices with decreasing apartment sizes is now evident within the municipality with the price of the apartments remaining the same or even increasing despite size.”

And it cites a Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) decision for a 36-storey housing development at 58-66 LaTrobe St to justify its position.

It says VCAT “did not accept the applicant’s contention that a trade-off for the availability of the attributes of the cultural city is an apartment with a poor level of amenity and specifically stated ‘using affordability as an argument does not justify reducing amenity to a bare minimum’.”

Stay in touch with Southbank. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Southbank Local News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.