Residents' Association Image

Residents' Association

When is a footpath wide enough?!

Business in Southbank Image

Business in Southbank

Walk the Plank from the top of Eureka Skydeck!

St Johns Southgate Image

St Johns Southgate

The intelligible answers of faith

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

New Bill reads like a “favour for mates”

Montague Community Alliance Image

Montague Community Alliance

Montague – learning from others …

Metro Tunnel

Acoustic shed construction underway

Federal Politics Image

Federal Politics

Why Magnitsky Act is important for Australia

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Owners’ corporation bill

Southbanker Image


An altruistic vibe

Port Places

Fishermans Bend: the first quarter 2019

Housing Image


We are leaving an intergenerational time bomb for our children

History Image


Southbank’s sculptures

Safety and Security

Travelling safely in Southbank

Yarra River Business Association Image

Yarra River Business Association

Sharing our “big ideas”

Southbank Sustainability Group Image

Southbank Sustainability Group

Expanding sustainability beyond Southbank

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

Signs and symptoms of a toxic relationship

Skypad Living Image

Skypad Living

Neighbourhood Watch for vertical villages

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Ballet poodle survives snip

Southbank Fashion Image

Southbank Fashion

Spring racing in Southbank

Street Smarts Image

Street Smarts

Power Street – Southbank

Letters Image


Promenade cycling

We Live Here

08 Sep 2016

Call for action on court ruling

Apartment residents, the hotel industry and developers of high-rise apartment buildings are under threat unless the State Government acts.

In a decision released in the Supreme Court on July 22, Justice Riordan invalidated an original rule created by the developer of the Watergate building, meaning that owners’ corporations throughout Victoria are unable to prohibit owners from letting out their units to short-term guests.

In his judgement Justice Riordan said: “In my opinion, the prohibition of businesses generally and specifically businesses related to short-term letting exceeded the scope of what was intended by the Parliament in enacting the Owners Corporation Act 2006.”

The State Government needs to act quickly to amend planning laws and to legislate to regulate short-stay accommodation in residential buildings, otherwise:

  • Inner city apartment buildings will be overrun with party guests, holiday makers, boarding houses, backpackers, etc with fewer owner-occupiers and long-term residents and Melbourne could quickly become a city of ghettos in the sky;
  • The tourism and hotel industry will be severely affected: hotel revenue will decline substantially and tourism jobs will be lost; and
  • Property developers will have difficulty providing guarantees to potential owner occupiers that their homes would  not be turned into quasi-hotels.

Owners’ corporations Trojan Horse

To date, the only response from the State Government to the Supreme Court ruling has been to reintroduce into State Parliament, for a second reading  (Tuesday, August 18) its Bill on short-stays, which was first introduced into Parliament on May 23.

This Bill merely addresses the issue of noisy guests and nothing else and arose from the findings of a flawed “Independent” Panel set up by the former Minister for Consumer Affairs, which was compromised by conflicts of interest among some panel members.

On the panel was a short-stay operator but there was no representation from community or relevant resident groups and no consultation with these groups at any time.

During the second reading, held late in the day when very few MPs were in the House, all the government speakers followed the party line in saying how wonderful the Bill was and that it would address current problems in the short-stay industry. The common theme was that the ALP was meeting an election promise and they were feeling pretty good about it.

Clearly the new Minister for Consumer Affairs, like the previous minister, is totally unaware of or doesn’t want to know about the real issues and problems surrounding short-stays in residential buildings.

The one ray of light during the second reading was the contributions by Ellen Sandell, the sitting Member for Melbourne and Russell Northe, the Shadow Minister for Consumer Affairs both of whom had spoken at length to We Live Here and had an excellent grasp of the issues.

What can we do about it?

We Live Here is already in discussions with the City of Melbourne about amendments to local planning laws, which is a good start as it does understand the issues.

We now need to have discussions with the State Government.

Letters have been sent to the Premier, Ministers and all other ALP members requesting them to reconsider the Bill and to meet with us to discuss the regulation of the short-stay industry so there is a level playing field for all.

To date there has been no response and all previous attempts to meet with the Ministers for Planning and Consumer Affairs over the past 18 months have largely been ignored or hand-balled to one another.

We will keep up the fight until the government begins to engage with us. We now ask those of you who are affected by short-stays to also write to the government. The more pressure we bring to bear the better.

A meeting to discuss the issues will be held at Parliament House on Wednesday, August 31 from 6pm until 7.30pm to which all are invited. A flyer will be sent out shortly.

To assist us in maintaining the fight, please donate to our fighting fund which can be accessed via the We Live Here website at


The residents of Docklands are curious about what is pictured here. The photo shows part of the west side footpath at the southern end of Batman’s Hill Drive which seems to have been commandeered as part of a building site for months and months.

As Docklands residents we understand that the east side footpath is closed during building activity, however how can a developer apparently make free use of the public foot and cycle path on the west side?

What of the safety and tripping hazards for those using the path? Who would be responsible if an unfortunate injury occurred? Why do we have to put up with this unsightly jumble of building material as well as multiple rubbish skips? Would this be permitted anywhere else in Melbourne?

Clearly we don’t want both footpaths closed as that would be severely inconvenient for everyone; but as we live here, we are rather curious by what we see happening in Batman’s Hill Drive.   

On receipt of this contribution, We Live Here contacted the City of Melbourne. Within 48 hours a fine had been slapped on the builder and the rubble was removed.

People power at work!

Please continue to send us your contributions and feedback and join up to We Live Here.

Stay in touch with Southbank. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Southbank Local News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.