Residents' Association Image

Residents' Association

When is a footpath wide enough?!

Business in Southbank Image

Business in Southbank

Walk the Plank from the top of Eureka Skydeck!

St Johns Southgate Image

St Johns Southgate

The intelligible answers of faith

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

New Bill reads like a “favour for mates”

Montague Community Alliance Image

Montague Community Alliance

Montague – learning from others …

Metro Tunnel

Acoustic shed construction underway

Federal Politics Image

Federal Politics

Why Magnitsky Act is important for Australia

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Owners’ corporation bill

Southbanker Image


An altruistic vibe

Port Places

Fishermans Bend: the first quarter 2019

Housing Image


We are leaving an intergenerational time bomb for our children

History Image


Southbank’s sculptures

Safety and Security

Travelling safely in Southbank

Yarra River Business Association Image

Yarra River Business Association

Sharing our “big ideas”

Southbank Sustainability Group Image

Southbank Sustainability Group

Expanding sustainability beyond Southbank

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

Signs and symptoms of a toxic relationship

Skypad Living Image

Skypad Living

Neighbourhood Watch for vertical villages

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Ballet poodle survives snip

Southbank Fashion Image

Southbank Fashion

Spring racing in Southbank

Street Smarts Image

Street Smarts

Power Street – Southbank

Letters Image


Promenade cycling

Federation Square has a new CEO

10 Oct 2019

Federation Square has a new CEO Image

By Meg Hill

In an exclusive first interview with Southbank Local News, Federation Square’s new CEO Dr Xavier Csar said that failed efforts to build an Apple Store at the square had “catalysed” an important discussion around the future of the public space.

Management offices in Federation Square aren’t signposted. Tucked away on the eastern side of the square, the CEO’s office looks out above some of the open space between ACMI and the big screen.

It would have hosted a perfect view of anti-Apple protesters when they held a number of demonstrations in the square last year.

A more than year-long battle against plans for an Apple Store in the square centred its criticism on the Andrews Government, Apple, and then-Fed Square CEO Jonathan Tribe. Now, with Apple gone, heritage approved and a government review underway, Federation Square has quietly found a new CEO.

The replacement, Dr Xavier Csar, had recently spoken with one of the square’s two architects when he was interviewed by Southbank Local News. He said that architect had emphasised the “nooks and crannies” of the square’s built form – the hidden spaces that are meant to be discovered slowly.

But on the other side of the glass, protestors had highlighted the open public space where people gather, the classic use of a town square. The new CEO wouldn’t speculate on whether or not his predecessor had got the balance wrong.

“I don’t really want to focus on Jonathan’s management style because Jonathan retired and I’m here to replace him,” Dr Csar said. “But what I would say is that my first priority is recognising that this is a place that’s defined by the partnerships and relationships between people who use the square. It’s defined by those relationships and it’s important they’re good relationships.”

Dr Csar headed the TAFE division of the Education Department for four years. He said he was asked to take over at Federation Square because of his experience connecting public sector organisations with community and achieving financial sustainability simultaneously with public good.

“I’m looking to unleash that public value and understand what those around us need and want and to deliver that,” Dr Csar said.

“We’re a precinct but we are defined not just by the partners we have in the precinct – the cultural institutions, the commercial tenancies, the people who come and go – but we’re also defined by the value we bring to our neighbours.”

He was hesitant to imply that the square was at a crossroads, but there were subtle shifts in language.

For example, when Apple pulled its controversial plans to build a flagship store in the square, then-CEO Jonathan Tribe gave public support for the first time to the idea of gaining some degree of public funding for the square.

Those who led the Our City, Our Square campaign, which opposed the Apple plans, had always insisted that square should be publicly funded but they expressed concern at the framing.

They said Jonathan Tribe’s comments may have played up financial difficulties to justify further commercialisation. It’s a framing Dr Csar avoided.

“To the question of whether or not the square should get public funds, the answer is yes,” Dr Csar said.

“If the review wants to deal with that then that’s terrific, we’re here to be able to deliver that, but it’s not as if we’re not able with our current income to make this place available as you currently find it, because we are.”

Dr Csar added that big projects and developments in the square would likely require more funding, which could be individual budget decisions for government and not necessarily a change to the square’s funding regulations.

But he also gave a somewhat generous new spin to the current financial model of the square.

“It’s not that we’re not publicly funded at all. We get funds from the activities and organisations within the square, and some of those are publicly funded.”

Dr Csar also described the result of Federation Square’s “blend” – the businesses and commercial ventures as well as cultural (and government funded) institutions like the Koorie Heritage Trust – as a social enterprise.

The careful shifts of language seemed to acknowledge the tension between the idea of public space and the reality of Federation Square governance.

It is also a testament to the Our City Our Square campaign, which clearly identified the discrepancy between public expectations and reality for the space.

Melburnians, they said, thought of the square as a public asset and were appalled not only by the transparent commercialisation they saw in the Apple proposal and process, but that the square’s existence relied on profit in the first place.

“The Apple development just catalysed a discussion about the square – how public, how accessible, what’s the long-term vision and is this the time to have that discussion because there hadn’t been that discussion for a very long time,” Dr Csar said.

In reality, Federation Square’s charter, as it stands, ensures that it runs like a business, not a publicly owned asset. It has to stand financially on its own feet.

That seemed to be one of square’s real hidden secrets waiting to be discovered.

Dr Csar didn’t say which one he had spoken to, but it’s no secret that the Federation Square’s two architects diverge when it comes to the square’s future. One of the architects enthusiastically supported the Apple proposal, the other denounced it. One cherishes the commercial element of the square, the other doesn’t.

That division supports the idea that opinions on the issue are not fundamentally about Federation Square but are based on political divides over the question of public space.

The government is due to release its community consultation report late this year and has given few clues as to where it might lead. It’s a comprehensive review that was given the scope to change the nature of the square, but it could easily satisfy itself tinkering around the sides.

The view from Dr Csar’s window will likely be protest-free at least until we find out.

Stay in touch with Southbank. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Southbank Local News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.