Columns
Business in Southbank Image

Business in Southbank

Family-friendly apartments
Read more >>

St Johns Southgate Image

St Johns Southgate

Why, oh why, can’t we?
Read more >>

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

Take more care with your insurance
Read more >>

Montague Community Alliance Image

Montague Community Alliance

Montague hosts a community roundtable
Read more >>

Metro Tunnel

Construction of Anzac Station
Read more >>

Federal Politics Image

Federal Politics

Why Magnitsky Act is important for Australia
Read more >>

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

A Royal Commission into industry scandals
Read more >>

Southbanker Image

Southbanker

Coach Kim’s “headquarters”
Read more >>

Port Places

Fishermans Bend: the first quarter 2019
Read more >>

Housing Image

Housing

We are leaving an intergenerational time bomb for our children
Read more >>

History Image

History

Southbank Morgue
Read more >>

Yarra River Business Association Image

Yarra River Business Association

A constantly changing market
Read more >>

Southbank Sustainability Group Image

Southbank Sustainability Group

Low environmental footprint
Read more >>

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

What’s your attachment style?
Read more >>

Skypad Living Image

Skypad Living

High-density cycling
Read more >>

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Pram-powered princess Sophia
Read more >>

Southbank Fashion Image

Southbank Fashion

Spring racing in Southbank
Read more >>

Street Smarts Image

Street Smarts

Power Street – Southbank
Read more >>

Letters Image

Letters

Taxi chaos
Read more >>

Sturt St ‘shocker’

26 Oct 2014

Sturt St ‘shocker’ Image

Melbourne City councillors lined up to express their disgust at a planning proposal submitted for 248 Sturt St at the October 7 Future Melbourne Committee meeting.

They unanimously opposed a 46-storey, Elenberg Fraser-designed proposal which was more than two times the preferred height limit and would overshadow a nearby Kings Way park.

Planning officers recommended the councillors advise the Minister for Planning to reject the proposal, which was described in their report as an “overwhelmingly dominant and intimidating” building.

Cr Ken Ong labeled the 25,190 sqm proposal “a shocker”, calling it a desperate attempt by the developer to bypass the City of Melbourne’s authority to adjudicate applications up to 25,000 sqm.

“Numerous negatives have been highlighted by all the different departments, which just basically says that this one’s just not good enough,” he said.

“I don’t know whether it’s the developer or it’s the architect that’s been pushing this sort of boundary to squeeze in as much as possible to get it over 25,000 sqm, ignore everyone and anyone living nearby.”

The application has been submitted by racing identity Lloyd Williams’ development company Hudson Conway.

Cr Stephen Mayne expressed his disappointment at the developer for submitting what he labeled as “trash”.

“I guess I’m just a little bit disappointed with Lloyd Williams after decades as a very high-profile developer in this town,” he said.

“That in the twilight of the career that a shocker like this comes through the door at five minutes to midnight looking for a favour from the Minister.”

Lord Mayor Robert Doyle also voiced his opposition to the proposal, stating it was difficult to find a criterion that the building succeeded in.

“Height, massing, scale, internal configuration, sustainability, the amenity of the Arts Precinct, that the building should address the street, the overshadowing provisions and not least the aesthetic,” he said.

“It fails miserably on all of those and I think it should be rejected vigorously.”

Stay in touch with Southbank. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Southbank Local News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.